Refering to the news report of " the meeting of cluster bomb ", international media is for the prejudice of China

From " prohibit with

Before formally working every day, always like to glance over the news of same day first. This not, the morning 7 of January 23,2007: 45( Australian Melbourne time), the Chinese of BBC ( British Broadcasting Corporation ) has so a news impressively in the front page of net. Title is " Norwegian meeting will prohibit the U.S.-Russian absence in cluster bomb ". My intuition is " is good! Again is one Sino-Russian jointly oppose the news of America. This confrontation does , is big, just as both sides have laid card on the table thoroughly, are unexpectedly absent so as show protest ". Afterwards, have seen carefully that one takes off content , is not only not so, and and my original tentative idea is widely divergent.

The content of report is so. Because the use of cluster bomb can cause the huge casualties of common people( for example the conflict of last year of the Lebanon and Israel of year end), so, a hobby peaceful country calls the initiation of Norway a prohibit to use the international meeting of cluster bomb, on world, Foreign Minister of 48 countries attends this meeting. But among now on world, some most powerful countries of military strength oppose to prohibit to use cluster bomb all, include the 5 Permanent Members of U.N. Security Council, there are still Israel, Canada and India. When report is final, have still added a sentence " the however Chinese countries such as Britain and America insist to think , cluster bomb is legal battle-field weapon ".

See that complete

It is first , has not claimed the meaning

In it is second,

3th not only opposes that they return absence

It is 4th, and, the Chinese role who takes on this matter is not very splendid seemingly, you see that in the country that description insists to use cluster bomb finally , China however queues up first place!

So, I feel that the report of this media is very interesting, after all, BBC is still the one of recognized most just media on world ( if the words that still have second home ), it has opened so a joke unexpectedly. The curiosity media that urges me to go to inspect other how to report.

BBC English channel is more interesting, its big title is " whole world prohibits with great efforts cluster bomb( Global drive to ban cluster bombs), in having not mentioned claim the matter of U.S.-Russian absence, but when subtitle has mentioned one to say " the absence in the United States and Russia( the non attendance of the< xml:namespace prefix=st1>< country-region w:st=on>US< country-region/>< country-region w:st=on>< place w:st=on>Russia< place/>< country-region/>And China) ", notice this a order of 3 countries

The title of the report of British Reuters ( The REUTERS ) is " Norwegian meeting talks about 8 years prohibit cluster bomb( Norway conference aims for cluster bomb ban by2008) ". Title foundation has no to talk about the problem of what country. But in writing, say , in" the United States and Russia and the other military power treaties of opposing this one ( The United States, Russia, China and other military powers have resisted moves to curb cluster munitions because they say humanitarian law already lays down guidelines for their use)". But still say ," Norwegian as well as Canadian support is prohibited with land mine( Norway, along with Canada, was instrumental in the anti-landmine campaign which resulted in the Ottawa treaty banning them)". . This news of Reuters quilt" New Zealander pioneer newspaper"( New Zealand herald) etc. newspaper turns to use. Have seen that it is vicious that rear feeling is , just as China also has no!

" British The Guardian " have published its columnist, also is the observation of human rights the article of Tom Porteous of London responsible person ( London director of Human Rights Watch ), title is " the relevant bomb of one problem( " An explosive issue "), in writing, criticism British government" must finish the opposition of not seemly it using this opportunity to prohibit with the stand of cluster bomb"( The British government must take this new opportunity to end its shameful opposition to a ban on cluster bombs). For other other countries, foundation has not been mentioned. In have seen this article , have to feel at two o'clock , is first, originally British and the United States and Russia the same is also very negative; Second, only criticism British government has the meaning of " like Yu deepen, hate Yu cut " seemingly, natural this also is it observes the trip of last stakes of London responsible person as human rights just.

In another European national Ireland,Ireland Online) the title of report is " Austria will prohibit cluster bomb, oppose in the United States and Russia( Austria to ban cluster bombs; US, Russia, China avoid talks) ". It is simple , has no stand seemingly.

The media of America quotes to join the news of many international society( The Associated Press) , includes " international pioneer forum newspaper"( International Herald Tribune) , " Miami pioneer newspaper"( Miami Herald) and " Los Angeles newspaper "( Los Angeles Times), British "The Guardian"( the Guardian) has also quoted this report. The title of article is " Norwegian meeting beginning will prohibit surely for 8 years with cluster bomb "( Norway conference backs2008treaty banning cluster bombs in draft declaration). Writing in write road " Sino-American Russian opposition this motion, and have not also sent representative to attend. Australia is Israeli, India and Pakistan have not also attended "( The U.S., China and Russia oppose the ban and did not send representatives to the meeting.< country-region w:st=on>Australia< country-region/>< country-region w:st=on>Israel< country-region/>< country-region w:st=on>India< country-region/>And< country-region w:st=on>< place w:st=on>Pakistan< place/>< country-region/>Also did not attend). Oh, matter is now, we just understand that a lot of country opposes this motion , and has not also attended this meeting , Chinese is in which one just. What place is different is that suit as far as current international last this one is concerned Zong the situation with horizontal company, as well as it is Sino-Russian to ally , American Iraq opposes , Chinese quilt and U.S.-Russian row are very sensitive together. In this writing, also mention that Norway has prohibited to use cluster bomb , Austria also begins to consider. Now is seemed , the report that joins many society is more overall and just.

We come again to see the report of Arabic media. " Lebanon everyday star newspaper "( the Daily Star) have also quoted to join the news of many society , but it is to pass the functionary editor of newspaper office to mark , the title of article is " international community drafts preliminary treaty prohibit cluster bomb( Draft international treaty would ban use of cluster bombs by2008) ", and join the news original manuscript of many society have no difference basically. Is its essence equal for every country to treat , are not especially vicious as outstanding who? Think carefully actually, this Lebanese little country just suffers the attack of cluster bomb in the end of last year, Premier it in televised speech sound tear all take off cry to ask for the help of international community. Whom now, does it dare again offend? Are you Israeli? America? China?

Another Arabic media" Arabic news"( Arab News) is interesting. Its title " is Austrian to prohibit cluster bomb( Austria Bans Cluster Bombs)". Writing in write road further " Britain, American and Israeli opposition should be suggested. The country of other oppositions still has: It is Canadian, French , China, India and Russia. Support the country that prohibits to use cluster bomb to include: It is Norwegian, Angolan, Belgian, Lebanese, Mexican, Mozambican, New Zealander and is Swedish( They now want to push ahead without the support of key countries such as opponents Britain, the United States and Israel. Other countries opposing a ban include< country-region w:st=on>Canada< country-region/>< country-region w:st=on>France< country-region/>< country-region w:st=on>China< country-region/>< country-region w:st=on>India< country-region/>And< country-region w:st=on>< place w:st=on>Russia< place/>< country-region/>. In addition to< country-region w:st=on>Norway< country-region/>, the pro-ban countries include< country-region w:st=on>Angola< country-region/>< country-region w:st=on>Belgium< country-region/>< city w:st=on>Lebanon< city/>< country-region w:st=on>Mexico< country-region/>< country-region w:st=on>Mozambique< country-region/>< country-region w:st=on>< place w:st=on>New Zealand< place/>< country-region/>And Sweden). Now is seemed , is in the eye of Arabic world , the most vicious country has become U.S.-British and Israeli , or in the eye of Arabic world, they are always most vicious? France had been joined for the first time by the name list of condemnation, because of France for eastern region in the past friend do not care about with territory? This writing has also joined for the first time the country that sustains to prohibit to use name list. These Middle-East countries, in a past century in the war of Israel repeatedly war defeats repeatedly, the Jerusalem of the Holy City is occupied nearly permanently by pagan, have splendid Arabic civilization has advanced gradually is gradually far or will become forever history, is current again since place global stiff anti-terrorism times the war of life Jing, for them, can prayer can only be also just. As to the name of " China ", in running long string national name list, it is also dimly discernible.

The newspaper of China how to report , also does not feel like to have said , all may also guess , meddlesome person may see that "People's Daily" how to say. However result how to is not important , because anyway, world is this appearance!